<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Technology Defenestration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weinshenker.net/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weinshenker.net/blog</link>
	<description>An Oracle Apps DBA&#039;s discoveries</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:33:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oracle versus RedHat and VMware by Lenz Grimmer</title>
		<link>http://weinshenker.net/blog/2011/07/26/oracle-redhat-vmware/comment-page-1/#comment-3219</link>
		<dc:creator>Lenz Grimmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weinshenker.net/blog/?p=258#comment-3219</guid>
		<description>Hi J, I just recently stumbled over this blog post and wanted to clarify two things, if you don&#039;t mind.

You wrote: &quot;Oracle’s Unbreakable Kernel is based off of RedHat’s Kernel.&quot;  - this is actually not the case. The Unbreakable Enterprise Kernel is derived from a recent version of mainline Linux, we try to minimize the number of patches we apply on top of it. The UEK will be updated to a new version from mainline every 12-18 months and is fully maintained and supported by Oracle.

With regards to the missing vmv_pvscsi driver - this was indeed a bug (as noted in the release notes) that was addressed in later errata releases of the Unbreakable Enterprise Kernel ( ELSA-2011-2010 for OL5/6: http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/el-errata/2011-March/002008.html and http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/el-errata/2011-March/002014.html)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi J, I just recently stumbled over this blog post and wanted to clarify two things, if you don&#8217;t mind.</p>
<p>You wrote: &#8220;Oracle’s Unbreakable Kernel is based off of RedHat’s Kernel.&#8221;  &#8211; this is actually not the case. The Unbreakable Enterprise Kernel is derived from a recent version of mainline Linux, we try to minimize the number of patches we apply on top of it. The UEK will be updated to a new version from mainline every 12-18 months and is fully maintained and supported by Oracle.</p>
<p>With regards to the missing vmv_pvscsi driver &#8211; this was indeed a bug (as noted in the release notes) that was addressed in later errata releases of the Unbreakable Enterprise Kernel ( ELSA-2011-2010 for OL5/6: <a href="http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/el-errata/2011-March/002008.html" rel="nofollow">http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/el-errata/2011-March/002008.html</a> and <a href="http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/el-errata/2011-March/002014.html" rel="nofollow">http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/el-errata/2011-March/002014.html</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Not all Oracle databases require a license by Leslie Agoras</title>
		<link>http://weinshenker.net/blog/2011/04/09/oracle-databases-require-license/comment-page-1/#comment-3208</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie Agoras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2012 14:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weinshenker.net/blog/?p=266#comment-3208</guid>
		<description>I was curious if you ever considered changing the page layout of your website? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having 1 or 2 pictures. Maybe you could space it out better?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was curious if you ever considered changing the page layout of your website? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having 1 or 2 pictures. Maybe you could space it out better?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Licensing Oracle on VMware vSphere by DRS Host Affinity rules can be used to run Oracle on a subset of the hosts within a cluster &#124; UP2V</title>
		<link>http://weinshenker.net/blog/2011/04/03/licensing-oracle-vmware-vsphere/comment-page-1/#comment-3196</link>
		<dc:creator>DRS Host Affinity rules can be used to run Oracle on a subset of the hosts within a cluster &#124; UP2V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weinshenker.net/blog/?p=278#comment-3196</guid>
		<description>[...] posting on the internet about Oracle licensing. Jay Weinshenker wrote an interesting post titled Licensing Oracle on VMware vSphere with usefull thoughts and comments from readers. Another blogposting by Jay titled Yet another way [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posting on the internet about Oracle licensing. Jay Weinshenker wrote an interesting post titled Licensing Oracle on VMware vSphere with usefull thoughts and comments from readers. Another blogposting by Jay titled Yet another way [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Yet another way VMware saves a company money on Oracle licenses by DRS Host Affinity rules can be used to run Oracle on a subset of the hosts within a cluster &#124; UP2V</title>
		<link>http://weinshenker.net/blog/2011/11/08/vmware-saves-company-money-oracle-licenses/comment-page-1/#comment-3195</link>
		<dc:creator>DRS Host Affinity rules can be used to run Oracle on a subset of the hosts within a cluster &#124; UP2V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weinshenker.net/blog/?p=269#comment-3195</guid>
		<description>[...] VMware vSphere with usefull thoughts and comments from readers. Another blogposting by Jay titled Yet another way VMware saves a company money on Oracle licenses House of Brick  can help you purchasing the right number of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] VMware vSphere with usefull thoughts and comments from readers. Another blogposting by Jay titled Yet another way VMware saves a company money on Oracle licenses House of Brick  can help you purchasing the right number of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oracle VM compared to VMware vSphere:  Part 1 by J</title>
		<link>http://weinshenker.net/blog/2010/07/05/oracle-vm-vs-vmware-vsphere_1/comment-page-1/#comment-3194</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weinshenker.net/blog/?p=96#comment-3194</guid>
		<description>Just as an aside to your comment, although I had concerns regarding the vSphere 5 licensing when it was first announced (and subsequently revised), I have yet to have any of the vRAM licensing restrictions actually effect my clients.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as an aside to your comment, although I had concerns regarding the vSphere 5 licensing when it was first announced (and subsequently revised), I have yet to have any of the vRAM licensing restrictions actually effect my clients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oracle VM compared to VMware vSphere:  Part 1 by Rob</title>
		<link>http://weinshenker.net/blog/2010/07/05/oracle-vm-vs-vmware-vsphere_1/comment-page-1/#comment-3193</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weinshenker.net/blog/?p=96#comment-3193</guid>
		<description>Hi
I&#039;ve been using VMware products for a few years now, and the new Vsphere 5 licensing has made me look at alternatives like Oracle&#039;s VM Server. I don&#039;t have a dog in the race between Oracle and VMware, I&#039;m not favoring either vendor.
But I will say that the OVM 3.0 is absolutely the worst piece of junk I&#039;ve ever seen.it simply doesn&#039;t work correctly.if you do manage to get things set up, you&#039;ll still get 
screen errors for various odd reasons ( Java?)..
the web interface OVM is garbage when compared to Vsphere..and for the $495 one-time licensing fee for Vsphere Essentials, it is WELL worth it..
with Oracle you get what you ( don&#039;t ) pay for; it&#039;s  is free for a reason..because it is 100% pure junk...
download the 60-day trial version of Vsphere and compare it to the OVM and OVS..
there&#039;s an old  saying &quot;if you can&#039;t party with the Big Boys, don&#039;t bother showing up&quot;. Oracle needs to take that to heart..this OVS/OVM product is simply not ready for prime time..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
I&#8217;ve been using VMware products for a few years now, and the new Vsphere 5 licensing has made me look at alternatives like Oracle&#8217;s VM Server. I don&#8217;t have a dog in the race between Oracle and VMware, I&#8217;m not favoring either vendor.<br />
But I will say that the OVM 3.0 is absolutely the worst piece of junk I&#8217;ve ever seen.it simply doesn&#8217;t work correctly.if you do manage to get things set up, you&#8217;ll still get<br />
screen errors for various odd reasons ( Java?)..<br />
the web interface OVM is garbage when compared to Vsphere..and for the $495 one-time licensing fee for Vsphere Essentials, it is WELL worth it..<br />
with Oracle you get what you ( don&#8217;t ) pay for; it&#8217;s  is free for a reason..because it is 100% pure junk&#8230;<br />
download the 60-day trial version of Vsphere and compare it to the OVM and OVS..<br />
there&#8217;s an old  saying &#8220;if you can&#8217;t party with the Big Boys, don&#8217;t bother showing up&#8221;. Oracle needs to take that to heart..this OVS/OVM product is simply not ready for prime time..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Oracle VM isn’t enterprise ready by J</title>
		<link>http://weinshenker.net/blog/2010/08/20/why-oracle-vm-isnt-enterprise-ready/comment-page-1/#comment-3188</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 16:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weinshenker.net/blog/2010/08/20/why-oracle-vm-isnt-enterprise-ready/#comment-3188</guid>
		<description>You can take snapshots of Oracle databases with both Oracle VM and VMware. It&#039;s well tested and works fine as a crash-consistent machine image (if you&#039;re not snapshoting the memory). I also believe Oracle on windows (and I know SQL server on windows) under VMware supports VSS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can take snapshots of Oracle databases with both Oracle VM and VMware. It&#8217;s well tested and works fine as a crash-consistent machine image (if you&#8217;re not snapshoting the memory). I also believe Oracle on windows (and I know SQL server on windows) under VMware supports VSS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oracle VM compared to VMware vSphere:  Part 1 by Eric</title>
		<link>http://weinshenker.net/blog/2010/07/05/oracle-vm-vs-vmware-vsphere_1/comment-page-1/#comment-3183</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weinshenker.net/blog/?p=96#comment-3183</guid>
		<description>Hello, 
I;m new to vmware and oracle VM , up to now virtualization was solaris zones ( sparc / x64) 
I have started with Vmware esx5 and ORACLE_VM 3.03
There is no doubt vmware beats oracle vm in the administration and management of the infrastrcture .
vmware vsphere management is logical and makes sense , it does a lot behind the scene for you and it WORKS !!
oracle_vm management is all but logical , documentation is incomplete and done for experts !! after more then a week of work , I installed my first Virtual machine. Now I&#039;m trying to start the console of that machine for 2 days .
Tried using I.E on windows / Firefox on Windows , never got it working.
I eventually had it running using firefox on solaris !! 
but it is not consistemt , sometimes it works sometime it just do no start !! no message no nothing.
I really wonder if companies are using oracle vm in a production environment ..
I have seen a lot of doc on oracle VM 2.2  but 3.xxx seems to be new and full of bugs ... 
Really disapointing ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
I;m new to vmware and oracle VM , up to now virtualization was solaris zones ( sparc / x64)<br />
I have started with Vmware esx5 and ORACLE_VM 3.03<br />
There is no doubt vmware beats oracle vm in the administration and management of the infrastrcture .<br />
vmware vsphere management is logical and makes sense , it does a lot behind the scene for you and it WORKS !!<br />
oracle_vm management is all but logical , documentation is incomplete and done for experts !! after more then a week of work , I installed my first Virtual machine. Now I&#8217;m trying to start the console of that machine for 2 days .<br />
Tried using I.E on windows / Firefox on Windows , never got it working.<br />
I eventually had it running using firefox on solaris !!<br />
but it is not consistemt , sometimes it works sometime it just do no start !! no message no nothing.<br />
I really wonder if companies are using oracle vm in a production environment ..<br />
I have seen a lot of doc on oracle VM 2.2  but 3.xxx seems to be new and full of bugs &#8230;<br />
Really disapointing ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On Oracles commitment to Linux by Charlie Johnson</title>
		<link>http://weinshenker.net/blog/2011/07/22/oracles-commitment-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-3155</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weinshenker.net/blog/?p=364#comment-3155</guid>
		<description>Has there been any news from Oracle on RH6?  It&#039;s now 2012 and rh6 is at 6.2.  From the conversations I have had with Oracle, they are still making no comment or commitment to RH6.  Has anyone heard anything one way or another?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has there been any news from Oracle on RH6?  It&#8217;s now 2012 and rh6 is at 6.2.  From the conversations I have had with Oracle, they are still making no comment or commitment to RH6.  Has anyone heard anything one way or another?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Yet another way VMware saves a company money on Oracle licenses by J</title>
		<link>http://weinshenker.net/blog/2011/11/08/vmware-saves-company-money-oracle-licenses/comment-page-1/#comment-3147</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 04:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weinshenker.net/blog/?p=269#comment-3147</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had that experience once. I got the SR duty managed immediately and the issue was then taken care of satisfactorily. Analysts (and even occasionally DBAs) get things wrong once in a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had that experience once. I got the SR duty managed immediately and the issue was then taken care of satisfactorily. Analysts (and even occasionally DBAs) get things wrong once in a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: weinshenker.net @ 2012-05-19 02:04:34 -->
